From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Sep 19 10:22:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22802 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 10:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat0066.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.188.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22796 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 10:22:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA22523 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 14:22:22 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 14:22:16 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Diablo thru NATD... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Morning... Has anyone succeeded in getting Diablo to work on a Windows95 machine *thru* NATD running under FreeBSD? A friend of mine is currently debating installing Linux, for which they supposedly have fixes, vs FreeBSD, which I'm trying to talk him into doing... We've tested just about everything else under FreeBSD with NATD, but it just seems to be games like Diablo (which appears to use UDP) that are causing the problem... I've thought about the -redirect_port option, except I don't know what port that Diablo is running on, and it would mean that only one computer inside the network (if I'm reading the man page correct, of course) would have the capability to run it at a time... Thoughts and suggestions? Thanks... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message