From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Dec 17 10:36:50 1996
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id KAA11160
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 10:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id KAA11092;
          Tue, 17 Dec 1996 10:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA09883; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:35:07 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:35:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199612171835.LAA09883@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To: Warner Losh <imp@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc: gdonl@tsc.tdk.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/2067
In-Reply-To: <199612171723.JAA07787@freefall.freebsd.org>
References: <199612171723.JAA07787@freefall.freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Warner Losh writes:
> Synopsis: An unitialized pointer is dereferenced in tickadj
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
> State-Changed-By: imp
> State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 17 10:21:59 MST 1996
> State-Changed-Why: 
> 
> Applied the patch.  It appears to be good and doesn't crash when tested
> on my recent -current system.

Was this patch even necessary?