From owner-cvs-all Sat Apr 20 12:52:48 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09CE37B423; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA02419; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:52:34 +1000 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:53:17 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Mike Barcroft Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES In-Reply-To: <20020420151104.P29857@espresso.q9media.com> Message-ID: <20020421054632.L23741-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Bruce Evans writes: > > Er, this breaks LINT. The purpose of LINT is to break expose breakage so > > that it gets fixed. History shows that commenting out things in LINT > > results in them not being fixed for longer. > > The commit logs seemed to indicate that hea was a work in progress and > doesn't generally work. I assumed hfa was also completely broken, but > I see now that mdodd just got it working again 3 days ago. I'll > reenable hfa, but there's no sense in enabling hea since it's a work > in progress and can only serve to disrupt other people's work. Both may be completely broken at runtime, but the lines for them had not even been edited in NOTES for more than 2 years, so they must not have been breaking LINT for most of that time. IIRC, they used to cause lots of warnings but the warnings were fixed soon after warnings became errors. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message