From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 14:56:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE46437B401; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE143F93; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:56:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5DLurjp095537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:56:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5DLuqEs095534; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:56:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:56:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200306132156.h5DLuqEs095534@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Peter Wemm In-Reply-To: <200306132154.h5DLsL4t018474@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200306132154.h5DLsL4t018474@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Spam-Score: -9.9 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.33 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.sys.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:56:56 -0000 < said: > We cannot use c99 on amd64 either due to lack of alloca(). libc:strptime() > uses alloca() and alloca is impossible to implement as a callable function > on amd64. It has to be a compiler builtin. Note that the bigger problem > is that libc is not c99 clean internally. I don't consider this a problem. Fundamentally, the C Standard Library may (and invariably does) contain things which cannot be implemented in Standard C. That's (part of) why there is a Standard Library. -GAWollman