From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Apr 14 17:05:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59087F89B19 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 17:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54BD8B13D for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 17:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w3EGv7Qo085286 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w3EGv7uK085285; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Carmel NY Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports Message-ID: <20180414165707.GA83446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 17:05:14 -0000 On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 02:30:09PM +0000, Carmel NY wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: > > {truncated} > > >This is another case (after the implementation of FLAVOR support that does > >not seem well-designed and causes lots of effort and inefficiencies in port > >management tools like portmaster), which makes me consider giving up my > >efforts to keep portmaster alive. > > Have you tried using "synth"? This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS, which broken all ports management tools except poudriere. -- Steve