From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Apr 28 19:59:58 2020
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B982C3874
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com
 [24.113.41.81])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "ultimatedns.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BXYV3tV6z4DLj
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com)
Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1])
 by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03SK01Lr063659
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from portmaster@BSDforge.com)
X-Mailer: Cypht
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200428144349.GV90255@fc.opsec.eu>
From: Chris <portmaster@BSDforge.com>
Reply-To: portmaster@BSDforge.com
To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: mail/mailman v3?
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:00:07 -0700
Message-Id: <f800ba2bddccd78d5a1cb4e674b0c0f9@udns.ultimatedns.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49BXYV3tV6z4DLj
X-Spamd-Bar: -
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.16 / 15.00];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.947,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.22)[-0.218,0];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US];
 local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:59:58 -0000

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:43:49 +0200 Kurt Jaeger pi@freebsd=2Eorg said

> Hi!
>=20
> > I see the mailman lists themselves are now on Mailman 3:
> >=20
> >
> > https://mail=2Epython=2Eorg/archives/list/mailman-announce@python=2Eorg/threa=
d/HHQN7V6NY7G5CTOSC3WBU7VXW5KEBGVO/
>=20
> Interesting!
>=20
> Looks like a very uncomfortable design for uniq URLs 8-(
Agreed=2E It's also appears to be only about half completed=2E
In the end, this looks more a downgrade than an upgrade, as
at *least* it completely abandons the previous archive system=2E
Making your previous archive, an archive of an archive=2E :(
Hyperkitty -- isn't that sort of redundant? I mean; have you ever
seen a kitty that _wasn't_ *hyper* ? :)

--Chris
>