From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 03:37:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7309A1065670 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 03:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Received: from hermes.acsalaska.net (hermes.acsalaska.net [209.112.173.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A688FC21 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 03:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Received: from [192.168.254.100] (66-230-111-187-rb1.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net [66.230.111.187]) by hermes.acsalaska.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m24377du019607; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:07:07 -0900 (AKST) (envelope-from royce@alaska.net) Message-ID: <47CCBCED.6040301@alaska.net> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:07:25 -0900 From: Royce Williams User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <20080303174335.xzd80uz0so48o8sk@webmail.1command.com> <20080304022120.GA67410@eos.sc1.parodius.com> In-Reply-To: <20080304022120.GA67410@eos.sc1.parodius.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACS-Spam-Status: no X-ACS-Scanned-By: MD 2.63; SA 3.2.3; spamdefang 1.122 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "Chris H." Subject: Re: What's new on the 127.0.0/24 block in 7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:37:41 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote, on 3/3/2008 5:21 PM: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:43:35PM -0800, Chris H. wrote: > I've looked at this software: http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/rbldnsd.html > > Why exactly do you need this software to bind to 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3? > I don't see any indication of it needing that. DNS-based RBLs don't > work like that, so I'm confused by this request. It's not uncommon to configure BIND to forward requests for a DNSBL zone to another local listener, so that one can take advantage of both BIND local zones and rbldnsd local zones. See http://www.njabl.org/rsync.html for an example -- the BIND config of which looks like: zone "dnsbl.njabl.org" IN { type forward; forward first; forwarders { 127.0.0.1 port 530; }; }; Royce -- Royce D. Williams - IP Engineering, ACS http://www.tycho.org/royce/ - PGP: 3FC087DB/1776A531 Amid a multitude of projects, no plan is devised. - Syrus