Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:32:14 -0700 From: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> To: stable@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Status Reports April - September, 2009 Message-ID: <b269bc570910130832g7c902eedxd34027e1fca1c54a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20091013035504.GA72620@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20091011175428.GA3626@freefall.freebsd.org> <20091013035504.GA72620@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:54:29PM +0000, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > FreeBSD/ZFS > > > > Contact: Pawel Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> > > > > We believe that the ZFS file system is now production-ready in FreeBSD > > 8.0. Most (if not all) reported bugs were fixed and ZFS is no longer > > tagged as experimental. There is also ongoing work in Perforce to > bring > > the latest ZFS version (v19) to FreeBSD. > > That's great news. However, my experience says me not place dot-zero > relese under business-critical tasks and load. > > What about status of ZFS in 7.2? Does 7.2 contain the same ZFS code? > > 7.2-RELEASE includes ZFSv6. 7-STABLE (after the release of 7.2) includes ZFSv13. 8.0-RELEASE will include ZFSv13. IOW, 8.0 and 7.3 will have roughly the same ZFS code, although I believe the plan is to leave it marked as "experimental" in 7.x and only remove that warning in 8.x. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b269bc570910130832g7c902eedxd34027e1fca1c54a>