From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 10 15:26:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC87A1065675 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BD18FC0C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1567018qcs.13 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q4Z+ByF9kxMh+S02/0AjoI8yWXFtB4DIUjDuKqxHJU0=; b=lduIKD4wUZigzebuYNmXi+JoLtXhXBOSmLs5fQUV7I+3kOQBdFUV3wYZ8eo7XAM7fk hF6PYqkD0jZiS/OqtuWkPpOOS3S3PwtYoPfUUg0JvOOXop+7XAHByYYeZRj5d6HgI4WS hLEoX/YtuFBbsHgnZUjo6QYJLTjUb1nZwans2kQ046N6FT3Ssh/UYZGsQE5/O4MQWTDa 7/SSZu/OVMs2owAiX1XejUiZrSXYtI7sWhKR1BxJk/em6AB8mwuezfzx+fAJayL6R/1g 7fBINT1e5cKPVYLh8/Z4011VrhAoajmrAIzSGn6i9eRcDjJ9sFSCvgv7+T1fuutN76qz Ul/w== Received: by 10.224.174.79 with SMTP id s15mr7878631qaz.37.1336663579757; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua ([192.75.139.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df8sm16941579qab.6.2012.05.10.08.26.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 May 2012 08:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <4FABDE10.8090304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:26:08 +0300 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120116 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz , freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-R amd64 - graid, should it survive 'pulling' a disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:26:20 -0000 Hi. This panic is not in graid code, but it can be called a problem of the graid's RAID1 implementation. If some disk returns _write_ failure, that failure may now be reported to higher levels. Problem is that UFS SU code panics on these errors in some cases. I'll try to look on it nearest time. -- Alexander Motin