From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 11:33:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86FF16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7733E43D4C for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i39IX3we018457; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i39IX3GO049974; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@realtime.exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i39IX3qE049973; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <200404091833.i39IX3qE049973@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: To: Jeff Johnson Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Copyright0: Copyright 2004 Frank Mayhar. All Rights Reserved. X-Copyright1: Permission granted for electronic reproduction as Usenet News or email only. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: "'freebsd-stable@lists.freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: 4.9 SMP Stability? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 18:33:07 -0000 Jeff Johnson wrote: > Can folks comment on 4.9 stability and SMP. > Are these rare fluke cases or a more common occurrence? I'm running 4-stable on several boxes. [217]~ >rsh ungoverned "uptime" 11:31AM up 173 days, 39 secs, 0 users, load averages: 0.20, 0.13, 0.09 [218]~ >uptime 11:31AM up 44 days, 22:53, 3 users, load averages: 0.22, 0.17, 0.17 [219]~ >rsh tinker "uptime" 11:31AM up 76 days, 1:40, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 All are running 4.9 and all are dual-processor boxes of different flavors. I think "rare fluke cases" is probably closer to reality. _I_ certainly haven't seen such a problem. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/