Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:49:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233664] enable LLVM libunwind for armv7, armv6
Message-ID:  <bug-233664-29464-M9lA4s9TH5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-233664-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-233664-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233664

Michal Meloun <mmel@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|Open                        |Closed

--- Comment #21 from Michal Meloun <mmel@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #19)
Well, the reality is that your commit broke ABI and many ports (rustc for
example but not only)  for armv7 (and the following made it worse). So it w=
as
"unusable" and "broken". Using your words, next time I would appreciate you=
 to
test your commits properly.
>From arm64 case, I'm afraid I mistaken the llvm implementation of libunwind
with that from devel/libunwind. libunwind from this port will compiles itse=
lf,
but many dependent ports will not. It exposes gcc-specific macros (a local
variable in a named register) that is not used when compiling the library
itself, but used by other parties. Did this looks like a humor for you?

Be honest, we are both people and we both have the right to make a mistake =
from
time to time. (and the truth is, as my age grows, "from time to time" gets
shorter and shorter).

I'm closing this bug.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233664-29464-M9lA4s9TH5>