Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 04:30:39 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com> Cc: "freebsd-rc@freebsd.org" <freebsd-rc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New knob for ignoring readonly fss in 340.noid and 310.locate? Message-ID: <20110502083039.GC6066@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20110502052739.GB20839@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20110430102521.GA11716@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20110430213157.GC5660@DataIX.net> <20110501081930.GA14448@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20110502025942.GA31396@DataIX.net> <20110502052739.GB20839@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k4f25fnPtRuIRUb3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andre, Give this a shot. http://patches.jhell.googlecode.com/hg/340.noid.patch Apply with ( patch -p1 -E < /path/to/340.noid.patch ) Then either copy the resulting script to where it needs to go and remove the old 340.noid or run one of mergemaster or etcupdate. This effectively pushes it to periodic/security/310.chknoid which makes a lot more sense than beeing in weekly as a non-security measure. Introduces: daily_status_security_chknoid_enable=3D"YES" daily_status_security_chknoid_dirs=3D"" By default it populates its directory list with zfs,ufs mountpoints and will not cross mountpoints as per '-x' options to find(1). On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:27:39AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: >On Mon, 02-May-2011 at 04:59:42 +0200, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >>=20 >> Andre, >>=20 >>=20 >> On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:19:30AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: >> >On Sat, 30-Apr-2011 at 23:31:57 +0200, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> >>=20 >> >> By default snapshots directories are hidden and treated as a virtual >> > >> >Is it possible to hide snapshots directories in UFS? >> > >>=20 >> Snapshot directories on UFS are treated differently than they are in >> ZFS. UFS snapshot directories live as the base of the filesystem and are >> not auto-mounted perse when you cd(1) into them so therefore there isn't= a >> need to hide them because they cannot be traversed. > >They are mounted and they have to be mounted (at least here). If >they weren't mounted, people couldn't access them. That's why >they are also being traversed by 310.locate and 340.noid. To >summarise: > >- I use UFS. >- My snapshots must be mounted. >- They are being traversed by 310.locate and 340.noid. >- I don't want the latter. > >To accomplish this, I can play around with (directory name dependent) >exclusion lists for 310.locate and 340.noid. I could also implement >a rdonly knob. > > -Andre --=20 Regards, (jhell) Jason Hellenthal --k4f25fnPtRuIRUb3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://bit.ly/0x89D8547E iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNvmuvAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+7BIH/0EEL3p7PizcEQkizixpSugv Bf7NnVoDN/DDoCb0LxqoaLd2FdymXGslpCDO4D40Y8Arvgu8wVN2eIeA58Am+3mx LOHYgE48Ub49bx5jiaMBmHPUoLBL5ELGSRnXYTKL4eGNVHyFfBcWT4pgZhAO2ouN r5PZULrBzXHfegy/OHayP95o8J6+0WkYidQSSkRSTSAyldVGsQeQctVWZXs6ECYq kBe8llKT8ZpcT196PSrvS9OWI2pDzt7+p4qzba5khUQRCKQA8YFY4PBDc9KFNsdT KRLUvb0PHwD8yuRY/A7+46ouJoM0Ks+9mGApwYOAW41p0RoCUCH4zUVW/STcOPU= =wsEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k4f25fnPtRuIRUb3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110502083039.GC6066>