Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:16:34 +0200 From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> Subject: Re: Suspend broken ? Message-ID: <1121109394.1330.0.camel@taxman.pepperland> In-Reply-To: <200507111101.29623.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <42C92DC5.3060101@gddsn.org.cn> <200507091517.57736.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1120939825.937.11.camel@taxman.pepperland> <200507111101.29623.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:01 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:10 pm, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:17 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > I think you just need to remove the extra { after the if statement on
> > > line 539 at the end of the line.
> >
> > This and changing timer0_max_real_count to timer0_real_max_count made it
> > compilable.
> >
> > But this time the system is immediately very slow (not just after
> > suspend) and I get this strange error message on startup:
> >
> > calcru: runtime went backwards from 68378390 usec to 67512958 usec for
> > pid 11 (idle: cpu0)
>
> I had never set timer0_real_max_count. :( One more time:
This new patch fixes the problem for me.
Thanks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1121109394.1330.0.camel>