From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 23 07:31:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA14034 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 07:31:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA13423 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 07:25:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [204.141.95.138]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA05821; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:30:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971223102841.00dde660@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 10:28:42 -0500 To: Tom From: dennis Subject: Re: de driver - STILL needs a patch? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk At 11:45 AM 12/22/97 -0800, you wrote: > >On Mon, 22 Dec 1997, dennis wrote: > >> de? still doesnt always comes up at 100Mb/s on boot (cant autodetect) with >> the -C rev devices. with v2.22 there was a patch to make all that work....is >> there a patch that makes 2.2.5 work? >> >> Why can't this stuff get commited after half a year? > > You assuming that it can be fixed. Reliable 100mbs detection is rare >with all hardware. But it USED to work in 2.2.2...which implies that it can be done. no? dennis