From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 05:24:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D983E16A4CF; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:24:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5985A43D39; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from lap (c-24-130-110-32.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.110.32]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040812052418011004l9koe>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:24:19 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:24:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Kirill Ponomarew In-Reply-To: <20040812050216.GA68728@voodoo.oberon.net> Message-ID: <20040811221913.M817@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <411AA66A.8020908@DougBarton.net> <20040812050216.GA68728@voodoo.oberon.net> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: "cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: "ports-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" cc: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/dns Makefile ports/dns/bind93 Makefiledistinfo pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:24:21 -0000 On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:06:18PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Oliver Eikemeier wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't this have been a repocopy from dns/bind9? >> >> No. > > Please remove this port, create PR with repocopy request and > assign it to portmgr. I've already expressed my opinion on this point pretty clearly, so if you intend this to be an official portmgr action, I'm interested in knowing what the appeals process is. I can't escape the feeling that you're falling back on a hard line here without actually listening to what I'm saying. Rather than continuing to have this discussion publicly, I'm perfectly happy to carry it on quietly if y'all are. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection