From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 17 21:59:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6968FD6F; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@fubar.geek.nz) Received: from nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (nibbler.fubar.geek.nz [199.48.134.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABAE2708; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.Home (97e5e46b.skybroadband.com [151.229.228.107]) by nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA375E30D; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 22:59:18 +0100 From: Andrew Turner To: Ian Lepore Subject: Re: svn on armv5 with clang? (Fwd: svn commit: r254539 - head/usr.bin) Message-ID: <20130917225918.7a4728b1@bender.Home> In-Reply-To: <1379442285.1197.49.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <201308191744.r7JHiJ00063824@svn.freebsd.org> <20130917190215.7093f261@bender.Home> <1379442285.1197.49.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:59:27 -0000 On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:24:45 -0600 Ian Lepore wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 19:02 +0100, Andrew Turner wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:13:22 +0200 > > "Ronald Klop" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am reading up on commits and found this one. Is ARMv5 capable > > > of building the in-tree svn also? > > > > > It is unlikely, I don't think we provide the required atomic > > functions for ARMv5. On armv6 clang provides them, however I don't > > thing it knows how to set up ARM_RAS_START. Without this we have to > > implement more of the __sync_* functions for svn to work on ARMv5. > > I don't know of any plans to add them. > > > > I don't remember ever hearing about plans to *drop* support for armv4 > and v5, but with responses like that, that seems to be what's > underway. That is because there are no plans to drop armv4/5 support, however I am also unaware of any plans to implement the required functions that clang provides on armv6. The only support I am planning on dropping is for armv6eb[1] as it is unused, and almost certainly broken. None of our kernels can boot on ARMv6/7, and the little-endian kernels don't have the required magic to be able to switch endian when required. Andrew [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~andrew/rm_armv6eb.diff