Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:32:37 +0200 From: Oliver Braun <obraun@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rsync 5.x breakage Message-ID: <20020616183237.GA85136@unsane.de> In-Reply-To: <3D0CD679.564603D@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020616040000.A16402@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020616123029.GA12998@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> <3D0CD679.564603D@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> [2002-06-16 20:20]:
> Oliver Braun wrote:
> > The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if
> > file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile
> > uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the
> > backup file with ${RM} file.bak between the calls.
> >
> > ==> ${REINPLACE_CMD} has different semantics on -current and -stable
> Given that we're currently discussing alternatives to REINPLACE_CMD, I
> would suggest that for now, not trying to switch all the ports over to
> it might be a good idea.
OK. So, I am going to suspend my work on switching the ports maintained
by ports@ to ${REINPLACE_CMD}. Or should I go on submitting patches?
Regards,
Olli
--
IST & IIS _ INF _ UniBwM ___________ http://ist.unibw-muenchen.de/People/obraun/
Tele-Consulting GmbH _______________ http://www.tele-consulting.com/ ___ obraun@
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve ________ http://www.freebsd.org/ ___________________
GnuPG: 0xEF25B1BA Fingerprint: 6A3B 042A 732E 17E4 B6E7 3EAF C0B1 6B7D EF25 B1BA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020616183237.GA85136>