From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun Jun 18 11:48:59 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA26381
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jun 1995 11:48:59 -0700
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA26355
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jun 1995 11:48:56 -0700
Received: by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.6.10/1.53)
    id UAA03766; Sun, 18 Jun 1995 20:48:38 +0200
From: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij)
Message-Id: <199506181848.UAA03766@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.05R: failure to get fd parameters correctly
To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 1995 20:48:38 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506181802.LAA02028@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 18, 95 11:02:49 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 859       
Sender: bugs-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I tried to install 2.05R on a CSSI only system with a 2GB Quantum
> > EMPIRE_2100S (Btw: dont try this at hoime..that disk sucks)
> 
> What is wrong with the Quantum Empire 2100S?  I use to have one and
> loved it, and I know lots of folks who have them and have had no
> problem with them.  Please don't slam the product without stating
> a reason it is bad, you hurt some of your fellow hackers when you
> do this as next time I go to sell someone an Empire 2100 who has
> read your post I have to dispell what was said :-(.  If it has some
> facts to it makes it easier for me to counter or confirm :-).
> 

We use it for news here. And within 8 months we are now using the 
third one. 2 others just began giving various media errors. And yes,
automatic reallocs were enabled on this disk.
I think this is bad. 

-Guido