From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 22:48:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D96CCC0 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCADE8FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:48:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:48:35 +0100 Message-ID: <50B3F1C3.2070801@ose.nl> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:48:35 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1-RELEASE References: <20121126214212.CF2DCE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <50B3EC42.2050304@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:48:38 -0000 On 11/26/12 23:36, Rick Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: >> Hi >> Just modify newvers.sh to 9.1-RELEASE recompile and your on RELEASE :) >> Who has a no non-release policy, management? > It's not just management, checked, they don't have a clue, that's what we're here for > but also software engineers, checked, mutually accepted, they know what you're up to, and keep them clear, be honest and even better, they know what they're up to, but try to blame you for just keep them as very close 'friends' it helps when you are able to 'clean up their messes sometimes' > architects is like in between management and software engineers, dangerous maybe > , and > business folks. management or otherwise > When a company runs a service whose production SLA is > 100%, many tend to be less forgiving. 100% that's a dare! For them it may be 100%, for me I am at 98% then, at best 99,636% :) There is a lot of playfield unknown > There's a lot riding on running > a development branch in production, even if it is a "Release > Candidate". > Agree 100% :) RELEASE is better than RC or even BETA for sakes ;)