From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr 13 16:32:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from roma.coe.ufrj.br (roma.coe.ufrj.br [146.164.53.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 28DD514E5E; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br)
Received: (from jonny@localhost)
	by roma.coe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA18173;
	Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:29:49 -0300 (EST)
	(envelope-from jonny)
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Message-Id: <199904132329.UAA18173@roma.coe.ufrj.br>
Subject: Re: ports/9925: New port, br-ispellf
In-Reply-To: <199904132324.QAA49308@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami at "Apr 13, 1999  4:24:49 pm"
To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 20:29:49 -0300 (EST)
Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, taoka@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	ache@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

#define quoting(Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
//  *   I do not.  I do BUILD_DEPEND it, because it needs buildhash
//  * installed to build.  But if you meant that having RUN_DEPEND is a good
//  * thing, I must agree; there's no sense in having a ispell dictionary
//  * without ispell installed.  I just did not know which was the preferred
//  * option.  There was a precedent: rispell, from which I copied the basic
//  * idea.
// 
// If it indeed makes no sense, I don't see why you shouldn't add a
// dependency.  Are there really no programs other than ispell itself
// that can use ispell dictionaries?

None that I know.  emacs, maybe ?

					Jonny

--
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis			jonny@jonny.eng.br


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message