From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 19:30:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAF21065670 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@pcbsd.org) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com (newknight.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679D28FC08 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ixsystems.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB44A66427 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.iXsystems.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ixsystems.com (mail.ixsystems.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79588-02 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:11:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.186] (75-130-56-30.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [75.130.56.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C654A66467 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DFF9B4C.8020907@pcbsd.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:11:08 -0400 From: Kris Moore User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110430 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20110620195210.0e0f8b2f@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20110620195210.0e0f8b2f@ernst.jennejohn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SUJ progress report X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:30:09 -0000 On 06/20/2011 13:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:19:36 -1000 (HST) > Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Kirk, Peter and I have been working hard on SUJ. We still have a few bugs >> related to snapshots but we fixed the couple of potential corruption >> problems that came up over the last year. If you are not currently using >> SUJ I implore you to do so and report any problems you may find.. We need >> to get better coverage if we are going to enable it for 9.0 which I think >> everyone would like to see. >> >> I will send another update when it is safe to use SUJ + snapshots. >> > All I can say is that I've been using SUJ since day one and it's saved > my bacon any number of times. > > In the last week alone I've had to reset my box 4 times due to hangs in > X and it sure was nice having SUJ recover my file systems in fractions > of a minute rather than waiting 30 minutes for fsck. > We've defaulted to having it enabled for the past several months now on our PC-BSD 9-snapshots, and it's been working great. Haven't had any complaints or problems reported from our testers. -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystems