Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:11:08 -0400 From: Kris Moore <kris@pcbsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SUJ progress report Message-ID: <4DFF9B4C.8020907@pcbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110620195210.0e0f8b2f@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106190914210.1593@desktop> <20110620195210.0e0f8b2f@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/20/2011 13:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:19:36 -1000 (HST) > Jeff Roberson<jroberson@jroberson.net> wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Kirk, Peter and I have been working hard on SUJ. We still have a few bugs >> related to snapshots but we fixed the couple of potential corruption >> problems that came up over the last year. If you are not currently using >> SUJ I implore you to do so and report any problems you may find.. We need >> to get better coverage if we are going to enable it for 9.0 which I think >> everyone would like to see. >> >> I will send another update when it is safe to use SUJ + snapshots. >> > All I can say is that I've been using SUJ since day one and it's saved > my bacon any number of times. > > In the last week alone I've had to reset my box 4 times due to hangs in > X and it sure was nice having SUJ recover my file systems in fractions > of a minute rather than waiting 30 minutes for fsck. > We've defaulted to having it enabled for the past several months now on our PC-BSD 9-snapshots, and it's been working great. Haven't had any complaints or problems reported from our testers. -- Kris Moore PC-BSD Software iXsystems
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DFF9B4C.8020907>