From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jan 28 11: 5: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from bytor.rush.net (bytor.rush.net [209.45.245.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C611215B2C for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:05:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lynch@bsd.unix.sh) Received: from localhost (lynch@localhost) by bytor.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28595; Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:03:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:03:39 -0500 (EST) From: Pat Lynch X-Sender: lynch@bytor.rush.net To: Jonathon McKitrick Cc: Jason Evans , Wes Peters , Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/13644 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org nope, this is closer to actually detaching your terminal with something running and remotely reattaching it. X has nothing to do with it. 'screen' here referring to the actual utility, not screen as in monitor screen. -Pat __ Pat Lynch lynch@rush.net lynch@bsdunix.net lynch@unix.sh lynch@blowfi.sh Systems Administrator Rush Networking On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Pat Lynch wrote: > >I find screen excellent for alot of uses, one being the fact that I can be > >working on something at work, detach the screen and resume it when I get > >home. > > Is this in any way similar to a remote xclient/server combo? > > -=> jm <=- > > If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around, does anybody > care? > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message