From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 09:59:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE9016A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:59:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.hispeed.ch (mxout.hispeed.ch [62.2.95.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423C043D39 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (217-162-157-43.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.157.43])iAT9xsi2023398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:59:55 +0100 Received: from gicco.here (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAT9xsIw001313 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:59:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by gicco.here (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAT9xs6u001312 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:59:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) X-Authentication-Warning: gicco.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:59:54 +0100 From: Hanspeter Roth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041129095954.GA1282@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <41AA785C.5020304@math.missouri.edu> <20041129084934.GA800@gicco.homeip.net> <41AAEBD9.9010705@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41AAEBD9.9010705@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Beastie X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:59:57 -0000 On Nov 29 at 10:28, Michael Nottebrock spoke: > Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=70231 > > I would much prefer seeing this patch getting committed after instead of > completely disabling the bootmenu as recently committed. The problem here is, that the Beastie picture is disabled by default. This is obviously not compatible with the majority of people. I intend to submit a more conservative patch, maybe this evening. -Hanspeter