From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 13 09:56:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA26277 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:56:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA26266 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 09:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA23356; Tue, 13 Feb 1996 10:49:58 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199602131749.KAA23356@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Is it just my imagination... To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 10:49:58 -0700 (MST) Cc: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199602130455.PAA09264@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Feb 13, 96 03:25:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Charles Kenneth Green - PRC stands accused of saying: > > Yes it is. (to site an example) At USENIX, when BSDi was asked if > > they were going to implement a lockd they replied saying that they were > > going to wait for FreeBSD to implement it first and then "examine" it's > > implementation. > > Well, that's fair enough I guess, as long as they credit the implementors. > > If they're really actually picking up ideas from us, it'd be nice to > hear the occasional 'thanks' back from them. We have their "init" code, I believe. I *would* like to see their login.conf changes publically available, but that might be considered part of their "value add" for their niche as an ISP platform? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.