Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 07:53:23 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, bde@zeta.org.au, davidg@Root.COM, phk@critter.tfs.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org, phk@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/gen Makefile.inc divsi3.S fixdfsi.S fixunsdfsi.S udivsi3.S Message-ID: <199510061353.HAA05315@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199510060705.AAA05173@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <199510051630.KAA07433@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199510060705.AAA05173@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * > >The divsi3 stuff is inlined by gcc, and the fixdfsi stuff is in libgcc > * > > * > Isn't there still a problem with functions from shared libs being linked > * > to before static libraries? > * > * Yes. But it's actually being worked on. :) > > You mean by gcc inserting a -Bstatic and -Bdynamic around -lgcc (or > something like that)? Nope. The underlying problem is being worked on. > Why are we still shipping libgcc.so.261.0 with the bindist anyway? > Now that "make world" doesn't make it, shouldn't that be part of > compat205dist? Yep. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510061353.HAA05315>