Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:10:02 GMT From: Alec Kloss <alec-keyword-freebsd.org.a6e2e4@SetFilePointer.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/138284: security/openssh-portable: OpenSSH GSSAPI Key Exchange patch updated Message-ID: <200908301410.n7UEA29W035192@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/138284; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alec Kloss <alec-keyword-freebsd.org.a6e2e4@SetFilePointer.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> Cc: Alec Kloss <alec-keyword-freebsd.org.a6e2e4@SetFilePointer.com>, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/138284: security/openssh-portable: OpenSSH GSSAPI Key Exchange patch updated Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:00:55 -0500 --jdAw5H+0hw/nhz1g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2009-08-29 22:12, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:47:33 -0500, Alec Kloss <alec-keyword-freebsd.or= g.a6e2e4@SetFilePointer.com> said: >=20 > > The current patch in the PR is heimdal-unfriendly. >=20 > I must admit that this really isn't a concern for me. (At this point, > I rather wish Heimdal would Just Go Away; it's served its purpose, and > it's still not sufficiently compatible with the Reference > Implementation to be useful to anyone doesn't have a 100%-Heimdal > environment.) Hrm... I haven't tried using MIT krb5 for anything serious for a long time as heimdal's always done what I needed. After a brief internet search it doesn't appear that anyone's had the heimdal-vs-mit debate lately. But that debate is a separate issue. > > Consider the attached variation which checks for HEIMDAL_HOME and > > defines a krb5_free_unparsed_name macro when using heimdal. >=20 > I'm slightly concerned about having this version of the patch not be > at the "official" site for this code. Have you offered your changes > to Simon? >=20 I have not explicitly offered the changes to Simon; I thought following up on the bug would be the best way to get in touch with the right people. I'm 100% fine with having the patch located anywhere else and the corresponding changes made to the Makefile and distinfo. The changes are pretty obvious so if someone offical wanted to re-implement them, that'd be fine too. If there's an alternative way to follow up with more appropriate people, just let me know. --=20 Alec Kloss alec@SetFilePointer.com IM: daemonalec@gmail.com PGP key at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xA241980E "No Bunny!" -- Simon, http://wiki.adultswim.com/xwiki/bin/Frisky+Dingo/Simon --jdAw5H+0hw/nhz1g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKmoYXkQ6e6D/NCvIRArvEAKDwaW2fJhsjAcwxfSs58RwFsfR4LQCgiUzo H8LFL/SYF1GrcnH9te4JVzs= =gacX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jdAw5H+0hw/nhz1g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200908301410.n7UEA29W035192>