From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 27 08:02:09 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE0837B401
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A1143F85
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 08:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h3RF27Bg022218;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost)h3RF255o022202;
	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: David Xu <davidxu@viatech.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <000e01c30cb4$30289b40$0701a8c0@tiger>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304271048300.20259-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pthread_join
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:02:09 -0000

On Sun, 27 Apr 2003, David Xu wrote:
> I found I can not get the following race fixed:
> Thread A is a joiner of  thread B, thread C calls pthread_cancel on A,
> because of multipile scheduler locks,  I can not get the race fixed. 
> Is it possible we just use a single scheduler lock to simplify things a bit?

Hmm, you mean if thread A is already joined on B?  I don't see the
race.  Everything looks right.  We don't take multiple scheduling
locks at the same time, so everything should work.

-- 
Dan Eischen