From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 23:31:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD0D1065673 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585988FC0A for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n55NVGeF086166; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:31:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n55NVGkW086163; Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:31:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:31:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Erik Trulsson In-Reply-To: <20090605232213.GA73749@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Message-ID: References: <139b44430906050557v4ce23a13r259535c3e839deb0@mail.gmail.com> <20090605232213.GA73749@owl.midgard.homeip.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Gabriel Lavoie , freebsd-questions , utisoft@gmail.com, Valentin Bud Subject: Re: Opinion request about a file server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:31:22 -0000 > Not counting the CPU and its power circuitry, I would be very suprised if > the other components on a normal motherboard pulled as much as half of that > even when under load. > > In fact a typical modern desktop computer will, when idle, draw less than > 100W for the whole system. It is not even difficult to put together a > system that will stay under 100W even when under load. > but power supplies are not really efficient when used at small load. maybe some newer are better...