Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:37:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: utisoft@gmail.com Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remotely edit user disk quota Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905282136080.61809@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0905281004h7a1f40cvb65f005d9ebe5318@mail.gmail.com> References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200905280847.12966.kirk@strauser.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905281553001.60364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200905280904.44025.kirk@strauser.com> <20090528183801.82b36bbb.freebsd@edvax.de> <b79ecaef0905281004h7a1f40cvb65f005d9ebe5318@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I know I sound like Theo, but security and reliability are ALWAYS more > important than overhead or speed. I really agree with You. That's why every admin (and user too) should think about what is he/she doing, instead of repeating the same mantras about security/insecurity of something.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905282136080.61809>