From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 2 5:13: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630B037B409; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 05:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id f92CCjB97521; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:12:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Review: change NGROUPS_MAX from 16 to 64 In-Reply-To: <20011002115206.M74839@sunbay.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX? None -- ideally, they would be the same. I was reminding him that if he updated one, he should be sure to update the other. > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred. Note also that this > > may have fascinating effects in NFS environments. Note also that you'll > > probably want to update KI_NGROUPS also. No idea if it will affect NIS. > > > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project > > robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message