From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 12:56:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B46216A403 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC23543D4C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so536680pya for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b90Mrp/TrQbd339fI2zuLSP29OAkr6nABCDPV8u1+BwdQ4SCMXSRHStQlBQ1u9XgUcexskKekRCJa1jEbO0LCS6gcaq/F9v8na8syaeZ4iRqQT3ovu+SNccuDzlflKAxgRqnAb0AAkQ1nGeXX/ejEqUCOvO3pSqezQDrD5hJSvo= Received: by 10.35.15.11 with SMTP id s11mr724351pyi; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.29.20 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0605120556g78e88afn290f25de3ff129eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:56:43 +0100 From: Chris To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4462FA0B.2090100@cty-net.ne.jp> <20060511150818.GB69548@xor.obsecurity.org> <8a0028260605110826h13211353rbe374ccc5f5e7ce4@mail.gmail.com> <20060511175135.GA71742@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: Kouji Ito , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:56:45 -0000 On 11/05/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: > > Are maintenance releases of old branches always released in step with n= ew > > ones, or is it just coincidence that it's happening this way this time? > > It was deliberate this time to avoid an extra ports freeze cycle, > since that has very high cost and the benefit is really low since the > intended audience for 5.5 is small and everyone who can do so will be > much better off with the enormous benefits of 6. > > Kris > > > Ahh makes sense to me now, since port freezes are annoying. So there is no danger of 5.5 been released after 5.4 EOL then? Chris