Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:21:44 -0500 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Torsten Blum <torstenb@vmunix.org> Subject: Re: zsh re-org Message-ID: <20000213212144.S92177@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <vqcu2jcrc88.fsf@bubble.didi.com>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 02:04:07PM -0800 References: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> <m12Jhwl-000OSPC@onizuka.vmunix.org> <20000212182711.A42371@dragon.nuxi.com> <vqcu2jcrc88.fsf@bubble.didi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 02:04:07PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > Torsten, I am not going to strip your maintainership at the moment but > please try to respond sooner to reports. As for zsh vs. zsh-devel, > they can stay the way they are, there appears to be enough objections > to change the default behavior. > > Ok? I'd only point out the objections are all FUD related to the fact that the authors label one beta and one release. I'd compare it to GIMP where the development version is actually more stable the then "stable" or "release" version. It is (as cpiazza pointed out) backwards compatible. I'm not saying the old version is unstable, I'm just saying that its been superceded. <forrest-gump> .. and that's all I have to say about that. </forrest-gump> -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect Computer Horizons Corp - CVM e-mail: billf@chc-chimes.com / billf@FreeBSD.org Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000213212144.S92177>