From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 03:27:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A7437B401 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hannibal.servitor.co.uk (hannibal.servitor.co.uk [195.188.15.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A722143F75 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:27:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@hannibal.servitor.co.uk) Received: from paul by hannibal.servitor.co.uk with local (Exim 4.14) id 19V7Ui-000CaN-Vg; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:27:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:27:16 +0100 From: Paul Robinson To: Varshavchick Alexander Message-ID: <20030625102716.GE34365@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <3EF95AF9.3040708@netli.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Paul Robinson cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Lev Walkin Subject: Re: How to delete unix socket entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:27:05 -0000 On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:29:19PM +0400, Varshavchick Alexander wrote: > But we're talking not about process, but about data structures which > netstat reports to be active and connected with the above mentioned stream > socket file: Terry has already given the answer - I didn't get your "I tried rm'ing the file but it's not there" mail until this morning. Reboot the machine. People are always so hesitant to reboot machines, when in fact uptimes of 500 days just means you're a bad sysadming. Returning your machine to a known state is always good thing to do - especially in your case. :-) -- Paul Robinson