From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 02:37:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB1916BA03; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0043D45; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:27:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C17A1A3C1C; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED20C515B2; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:27:41 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jiawei Ye Message-ID: <20060607022741.GA11522@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Sergey Matveychuk , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:37:35 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:19:27AM +0800, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >If you use fetchindex, this is expected. If you build the index > >yourself, but have your customizations in pkgtools.conf, it is also > >expected. This is why you should use make.conf for your > >customizations. > > > >Kris > Hi Kris, >=20 > I *know* that there are limitations in the base tools or what to > expect. sysutil/portmanager can do this well enough (correct > dependancy), that's why I *wish* portupgrade could do this too. It's a > wishlist right? Yeah..but the point is there's already a (correct) way to do it. > If all customizations are to be done in make.conf, what is the point > of MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf? Flexibility, it's not supposed to be the primary means of customizing your ports, that's make.conf's job. Kris --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEhjmcWry0BWjoQKURAnCuAJ0YP5gyKU0PH/5bB7+SD5uMrkPhpQCg9TZY A4VqXxBNlMUgl16wMOZcvhw= =pkkT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--