From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 16:01:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFD81065680 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w3.comete@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510E98FC20 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so1196171bwz.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:01:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=IVfvCxyZZxY/6WkO15gizkQrrCKFO2sR/UyuUPBQr0s=; b=QNfPLxM9wkp48dJnyvaEvMp8rBM8f4XFdQQVNng4t8SKkDg7Yr9MdFPZlhRSOGDHxi c7Ap5TDdi0jPYt49bX4wtwZbb3Sel3RCVkFRaFHZNw/3CU/vskuOHcpnxcWwiGfRuLYk dMbWEwaWCW7Lk5oyLg150x0BvFrMEyoFojmpk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=QdpGO/5NZ+njM/yzq+DCZvhs8c9rDNc2jUevP130jPi2RtcQn/IDS/YB2ZnPv2JG1S pGnFijiNmTJoVx7nt6aUR++mPdQwmZZcJ9yIFLV7F1J63iXL+WG/DtNZTe/p8L+dqc30 /1xIfitT7qzp19a5EaMqjcv1OCXsN5wUTbp1M= Received: by 10.204.81.223 with SMTP id y31mr1959581bkk.87.1277049659277; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OmegaLap (sml13-4-88-171-14-247.fbx.proxad.net [88.171.14.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z17sm38766169bkx.12.2010.06.20.09.00.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guillaume Seigneuret From: "Guillaume Seigneuret" To: =?UTF-8?Q?'Tjado_M=C3=A4cke'?= References: <010101cb0fb1$e015e370$a041aa50$@fr> <4C1E2575.2070405@maecke.net> <000301cb1090$df239fe0$9d6adfa0$@fr> <4C1E3A51.8080905@maecke.net> In-Reply-To: <4C1E3A51.8080905@maecke.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:00:56 +0200 Message-ID: <000401cb1091$c5ae06d0$510a1470$@fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcsQkTjVb54AMt9jSGedhF2FaBX+PwAAFjBg Content-Language: fr Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 Host X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:01:02 -0000 Could you tell us what did you do to test the stability ? Softs running on it, who many time and with who many users using it ? Thanks by advance. Cordialement, Guillaume Seigneuret Network and System Security Architect Web : http://www.omegacube.fr Address : H=C3=B4tel Technologique - BP 100 Technop=C3=B4le de Ch=C3=A2teau Gombert 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 -----Message d'origine----- De : Tjado M=C3=A4cke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net]=20 Envoy=C3=A9 : dimanche 20 juin 2010 17:57 =C3=80 : Guillaume Seigneuret Cc : 'Pandu Poluan'; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer 5.5/5.6 = Host I mean stable in a general way not for FreeBSD (didn't tried out it in PV yet). tjado Am 20.06.2010 17:54, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > I did try with Xen 4.0.0. > But more stable doesn't meens "suitable for production use" ... > I think the FreeBSD team has to work on its kernel to make it stable = under paravirtualized environment. > It's not really a question of Xen kernel version. > > Cordialement, > > Guillaume Seigneuret > > > > Network and System Security Architect > Web : http://www.omegacube.fr > Address : > H=C3=B4tel Technologique - BP 100 > Technop=C3=B4le de Ch=C3=A2teau Gombert > 13382 Marseille Cedex 13 > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Tjado M=C3=A4cke [mailto:tjado.ml.freebsd-xen@maecke.net]=20 > Envoy=C3=A9 : dimanche 20 juin 2010 16:28 > =C3=80 : Guillaume Seigneuret > Cc : Pandu Poluan; freebsd-xen@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: Paravirtualized FreeBSD 8 Guest on Citrix XenServer = 5.5/5.6 Host > > Hi, > > which version did you use of 4.0? For me, 4.0.1-rc3-pre runs more = stable > than 4.0.0. > Do you have some more information about the FreeBSD pv? Maybe i will = try > this howto: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D10268 > > tjado > > Am 20.06.2010 12:00, schrieb Guillaume Seigneuret: > =20 >> You're welcome, yes I guess it's safer to keep them in standalone = servers >> for the moment. >> For information I did try : >> >> FreeBSD 8 i386 paravirtualized on : >> >> - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel >> - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kernel >> >> FreeBSD 9 beta i386 paravirtualized on : >> >> - >> - Xen 3.4.2 with a 2.6.32 Linux kernel >> - Xen 4.0 with a 2.6.32.12 Linux kerne >> >> >> Configuration with mono CPU and 512/1024 Mo RAM, Disks on Dom0 LVM >> partitions. >> Plateforms : Dell T610, Dell R200, Dell R210. >> >> Cordialement, >> >> =20 >> =20 > > =20