From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 16:34:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78D216A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510CD43F93 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:34:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 46D4D2ED445; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:34:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:34:14 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: NH Support Message-ID: <20031021233414.GJ99943@elvis.mu.org> References: <3F95B946.8010309@newshosting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F95B946.8010309@newshosting.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: >1 systems 1 FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:34:14 -0000 * NH Support [031021 15:55] wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on a new cluster design and had a quick question. If I have > a few boxes mounting the same FS (over a SAN) all read-only will it > work? Will I have any trouble? Has anyone tried this with UFS/UFS2 .. You shouldn't. > Lets take it one step further.. lets say I have 1 box that mounts it > RW.. and it updates the contents .. will the other systems that have it > mounted RO puke? Likely. -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684