From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 14 18:17:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F02516A4CE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:17:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC11643D39 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:17:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4418F148D7; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:17:25 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:17:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <16750.49128.541439.894627@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:06:38 +0000 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: network slowness/freez-up since update 10/11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 18:17:26 -0000 On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Robert Huff wrote: > Speaking only for myself: > As someone who started tracking -CURRENT several months after > the release of 5.0, and who has the proven ability to screw things > up in ways unrelated to the actual code >:-( ... filing a PR is > (barring lack of sleep, low blood sugar, and/or "onw of those days") > the last resort not the first. (wearing bugmeister hat) I think the answer is "it depends". Certainly for build errors, my understanding is that they shouldn't be PRs, under the theory that someone will catch and fix them more quickly than the PR database will catch up. But my assumption is that for pretty much everything else that the PR database is the way to go. No? mcl