From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 00:25:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7127761E for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F47599A for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id za17so2875633obc.31 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=oznL197C0mVjVRtTTt5XlVez8lTWoKfOCIABa3dd5XA=; b=FA+FbFa50NFnQf20UVUjfJ4cfTngZu7KTzboIiMCUcZYV/SuB/8r9IHCcDaPccvc92 XkK9wxriUr5nYE+3NTAwCUgr5pw35Hq8iyVJzpmaVvFmb2u42AU9pmRg4SziU/aN3Mwl HaZq2i3T51jABesrspfPhfonFqaLus81qa+lpjuSgv8cFiQKrhGE9Q0yb2Y0d2B2mItX wRSJCiXgdC8jdDChVUlcjycPsoYvmCckNPE1cdoW9sSsu1jJrnIBXLmXGU21Y7kd3cEk XrhhsqG1xsTuDdM1fl3o9tLIMvfX8pTkrRD7ZKcNBGJFV2KvAhkw4c+GB+aR7w3t2uIT 3rMQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.157.44 with SMTP id wj12mr49510014obb.41.1357777541800; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.119.9 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130110071850.191a257c@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <20130109211439.5b590bf5@X220.ovitrap.com> <1357742133.9692.YahooMailClassic@web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20130110071850.191a257c@X220.ovitrap.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP From: Michael Sierchio To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlV7bSaYQbA9+cIqpYK5l1nIXFE1A8fXZ2m4IDAQ00nZZ44Hnw78iQymi5E/a96OwnxqGcE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:25:49 -0000 On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: > SMP goes into the applications. A single-CPU kernel must still run > these kind of applications. Applications may be multithreaded - and on a host with more than one (real or virtual) CPU, those threads may run concurrently. De quoi s'agit-il? What's your point? - M