From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May  2 07:22:25 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA29125
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 May 1996 07:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zNET.com (sd01.znet.com [206.43.105.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA29120
          for <hackers@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 May 1996 07:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squirrel.znet.com (sb39.znet.com [206.43.105.39]) by zNET.com (8.7.5/8.7.5-jjb-sd01) with ESMTP id HAA26520; Thu, 2 May 1996 07:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from thompson@localhost) by squirrel.znet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id HAA16228; Thu, 2 May 1996 07:23:58 -0700
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 07:23:58 -0700
Message-Id: <199605021423.HAA16228@squirrel.znet.com>
From: mark thompson <thompson@znet.com>
To: randy@zyzzyva.com
CC: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: message from Randy Terbush on Wed, 01 May 1996 20:05:06 -0500
Subject: Re: NetBSD filesystem compatibility
Reply-to: mark.a.thompson@pobox.com
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

   From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com>
   Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 20:05:06 -0500

   Is it safe to assume that a NetBSD filesystem is ufs mountable from
   a FreeBSD system. I'm about to find this out within the hour, but
   would appreciate a "heads-up" if anyone has anything to share.

   Thanks

Well, in *my* experience, FreeBSD 2.0R will not mount a NetBSD ffs
disk. This came as a rude shock to me when i upgraded.

-mark