From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 8 22:33:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C48316A4E8 for ; Sun, 8 May 2005 22:33:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DC943D60 for ; Sun, 8 May 2005 22:33:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhasaarinen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1381023wri for ; Sun, 08 May 2005 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=l6WhYVtnbRDxTunABTZf3xjdfYycUVr2Aw1NQMGxCk7GBQjMcJMF539GMLjyOQDWE7MX0rgKrrNi44sw4h8xJq3fDhAKAFu9o06kBSbPQVPqiMjlVCfN22vPpF5yT3dt1a+nqYFwzIu99TNo6tqMV5ony/aJLI9brnCP/pqDr8E= Received: by 10.54.156.15 with SMTP id d15mr2138270wre; Sun, 08 May 2005 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.4.47 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2005 15:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:33:09 +1200 From: Juha Saarinen To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <75751ca805050810264c913063@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: lists@freebsd.org cc: Laurent Debacker cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Fafa Hafiz Krantz Subject: Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juha Saarinen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:33:11 -0000 On 5/9/05, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >=20 >=20 > Laurent, let me spell it out - that last message was from me, Ted, not > from Fafa. I forged Fafa's name on it to show how easy it is to > forge mail and how it is not legally viable or possible for the real > Fafa to prove that the messages in the archive are really from him, > thus he would have no grounds for suing anyone. >=20 > I am sorry that you got hoodwinked, but I cannot think of a better > illustration > of the point I was trying to make - that even when the message itself > says > it's a forgery, that people still get taken!!! >=20 OMG, so it's Ted that's been spamming the list to pieces as Fafa! Well, that was pretty clever, but could it stop now? --=20 Juha