From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 22:30:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA11898 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:30:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Tyr.office.EFN.org ([204.214.99.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA11891 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spy@tyr.office.efn.org) Received: from Tyr.office.EFN.org (IDENT:spy@Tyr.office.EFN.org [204.214.99.45]) by Tyr.office.EFN.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA24008; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 22:29:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Reply-To: ben@efn.org To: andrewr cc: ben@efn.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Possible security "risk" in ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Why do you have /proc mounted if you care at all about user's sniffing around? -ben@efn.org On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, andrewr wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Ben wrote: > > > Maybe I'm mistaken, but ps(1) get's the info from /dev/kmem and /dev/mem and > > formats them according to /kernel, what would I need to patch? > > su to a normal user, and: > cd /proc > ls -al > cd > cat status > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message