From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 5 14:04:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351D316A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:04:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pulaski.gmtstudio.com (gmtstudio.com [80.55.96.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED66043D4C for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rafal@junglist.art.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pulaski.gmtstudio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED0A1B9C37; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:04:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from pulaski.gmtstudio.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pulaski.gmtstudio.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46962-14; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:04:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.4.4.4] (quark.zabki.net.pl [62.29.136.5]) by pulaski.gmtstudio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD0B1B9C12; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:04:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4204D26A.3070802@junglist.art.pl> Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:04:26 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Banaszkiewicz?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Clement Laforet References: <1107510981.23035.17.camel@localhost> <20050204144112.GA44383@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20050204144112.GA44383@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gmtstudio.com cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache 2 on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:04:24 -0000 >>What is currently the best (in terms of >>performance) choice for Apache w/ PHP on FreeBSD? Which MPM should I >>use? Does worker MPM use KSE on FreeBSD 5 and does it perform better >>than prefork? What about perchild and threadpool? Or maybe I should go >>back to Apache 1.3? Are there any sysctl or kernel tunings that I should >>use? Try to use 'eaccelerator' from www ports tree (development od mmcache has stopped - this one is continuation). If you'll notice heavy loads this could probably help. I also suggest to read this http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/perf-tuning.html and this http://talks.php.net/show/perf_tunning . How many requests per second has your webserver ? regards, Rafał Banaszkiewicz