From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 16:20:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAAF16A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:20:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE7743D3F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:20:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821B16520E; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:20:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 40780-03-6; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:20:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (adsl-64-171-184-46.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.184.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81CA65213; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:20:32 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A5A5B61C6; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:20:30 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Sam , Jan Grant , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040916162030.GK1047@empiric.icir.org> Mail-Followup-To: Sam , Jan Grant , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41483C97.2030303@fer.hr> <20040916151216.GB29643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040916151216.GB29643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Subject: Re: ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:20:34 -0000 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:12:16AM -0400, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote: > Where on earth would you find a disk system that can store 2^64 bytes of > data or larger, anyway? Don't physical and technological limitations > limit the total capacity of even the largest hard drives now available? > It would take millions of drives, or more, to create a single 2^64 byte > logical drive. You can bet that somebody, somewhere, needs this right now. And someone will definitely need it in the next 5-10 years. BMS