From nobody Mon Nov 20 18:25:18 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SYwsp273hz51gBW for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SYwsp004Pz3KMF for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1700504718; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7meJkCSL8vvW2WVA0uQ7z5HUhSVca8DbYNLJNkVfTsA=; b=OOWdMDJQvqtmT6p74vdZok/pVsp7JTVZ6fRYtaZV6QgaTsRAPYvkRFPJiHsSfLJP3PDqwh Ld6KErCtrkR7QcFeRNsQ5bDRLDmZukYH7HdDY5MaBfJIKdTVSYaXSaeJvZB8Krf3b4N4H4 WLf+j+a4wB68LL04CLyiRjNbwUkY4B4uWXHZfx4U9RB7V+IHiuyLwtLzOkRLk2Na4UeY7v Ims19sZaZWdma7A+eMrffqe94Ohf1VlCbzox97RM71Gsd0RTLR40Y9WtPhu0NEZSwgtQLy KbCfH1QuEgqnH5R4xFzwuuBB68NTvLnwjOTEqcdu1NQl8fmt9GgqYQ+r9GYS4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1700504718; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=V7CY3k/DjhcSFKNSmQtNXjqYtOLDCra4lr66cDUr2I4zz0cWibDUo9ZjwFWzZJVEB5koiQ rsamSHMA6PeYyc6dcTTTNKsQPIzaXKhcUoc9Mr19ZucE3bVT/QxVDo2LthPUk7hSxGwfM1 4BZh5MZMPWJKA6O6jBLDWfkm1LC3qviKc664cMvwPHYI20VTgfhgviJrAYnfK54vZCRwp3 J21TRSfueH3PtSgSrGcQFPRC7muReFwInDzFxinbY8heJYH3YBgMJJgX3NtRZmkniAqlWn ZTucvIvKVFRwvrJQEasu4pmsvdpk96r7zMwedwtU88yuOtXR21Smq/pMTyQDQA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SYwsn69w6z130k for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3AKIPHGJ098364 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3AKIPH76098363 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 275169] Panic: rw_rlock: wlock already held for tcpinp @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:2529 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 18:25:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275169 --- Comment #12 from Gleb Smirnoff --- Normally inp pointer is passed down to ipfw and if it is passed, the lookup= is avoided. So in the trace with tcp_respond the pointer was somehow lost and = ipfw looked up the same inpcb again. I'll try to reproduce it first on 13 and if I can, then will check 14. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=