From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 13:36:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D5216A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D911243D46; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [84.163.250.162] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1F4edU2tR1-0004Oh; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:36:33 +0100 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: Yar Tikhiy Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:37:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060201005658.A70005@xorpc.icir.org> <20060202070149.GD18601@ip.net.ua> <20060202124328.GK29980@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20060202124328.GK29980@comp.chem.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1981435.rUc0fTjnFz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602021437.38385.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Luigi Rizzo , Hajimu UMEMOTO , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_bridge.ko requires INET6... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:36:35 -0000 --nextPart1981435.rUc0fTjnFz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:43, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > This needs to be fixed in pf then. > > Max Laier and I discussed this issue once, and Max had concern > over possible performance degradation that might result from > calling pflog functions through pointers to be set by a separate > pflog module. We can skip touching the pf module in RELENG_6 for > now and leave the issue to after 6.1-RELEASE is out. I have convinced myself that we should really use a function pointer here. = I=20 will try to commit a sollution to HEAD over the weekend. If you are MFC'in= g=20 the changes *now*, I'd appreciate if you could spare out pf, but I am willi= ng=20 to MFC the changes before 6.1 if testing goes well. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1981435.rUc0fTjnFz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBD4gsiXyyEoT62BG0RAtxYAJ4iynhq7KJOsBRl0CThhhbSHQyArQCcDWGe yb8rH/+YQgePenOwh/Xz9W0= =rcug -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1981435.rUc0fTjnFz--