From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 31 06:05:35 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C7916A4D0
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8915043D45
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 06:05:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl)
Received: from toad.stack.nl (zen.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::130])
	by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3FF2D7AD#973B81F0E0; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333)
	id 6F98D97; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:05:33 +0100
From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-ID: <20031231140533.GA56158@stack.nl>
References: <20031231111642.GA13386@stack.nl>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10312310838140.25057-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312310838140.25057-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC
X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libc_r/uthread/uthread_join.c
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:05:35 -0000

On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:47:03AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > Is there a reason why in the case that a thread is not done yet,
> > pthread_join() does not call _thread_kern_sig_undefer() ?
>
[snip]
> 
> No, it looks like you found a bug.  Committed, thanks!

Hmm, ok ;-) But then why is _thread_kern_sig_undefer() called within
every if-case, instead of just below the if ? It looked like it was
contructed this way to be able to omit _thread_kern_sig_undefer() in
that specific case... ;-)

Zlo