From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 21 4:45: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from titan.metropolitan.at (mail.metropolitan.at [195.212.98.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F3614C8C for ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 04:44:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mladavac@metropolitan.at) Received: by TITAN with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) id ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:47:53 +0200 Message-ID: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C110027617968C@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at> From: Ladavac Marino To: "'mwang@tech.cicg.ml.com'" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: what is the command named "[" in /bin directory? Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:42:11 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: mwang@tech.cicg.ml.com [SMTP:mwang@tech.cicg.ml.com] > Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 1:40 PM > To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: what is the command named "[" in /bin directory? > > How did you conclude that they are not built in in /bin/sh > in Solaris? My conclusion is test and "[" are /bin/sh built-ins. test > is a built-in per shell_builtins man page, and [ ... ] is the same as > test. There is no "[" command in Solaris. > > The following is a list of shell_builtins from man page in Solaris: [ML] Well, the last time I used it, it wasn't. It obviously is, now. Sorry for misinformation /Marino To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message