Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:31:34 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD-arch@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru>, Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Subject: Re: Why don't we search /usr/local/lib and /usr/local/include by default? Message-ID: <20020619113134.A42703@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200206191828.g5JISdEI047709@dotar.thuvia.org>; from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:28:39PM %2B0100 References: <200206191828.g5JISdEI047709@dotar.thuvia.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:28:39PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > What is wrong with local/ in BSD.usr.dist? > > The permissions it applies (and the assumption that you *want* a > /usr/local, though that's doesn't affect me). > > I always used to get bitten after an upgrade by things failing after > the permissions on my /usr/local reverted if I forgot to maintain my > patch. From what to what? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020619113134.A42703>