Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:30:10 GMT From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91940: Unbreak port: editors/ooodict-all update checksums Message-ID: <200601180830.k0I8UAJV079412@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/91940; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91940: Unbreak port: editors/ooodict-all update checksums Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:25:15 +0200 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:00:23AM +0000, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org = wrote: > Thank you very much for your problem report. > It has the internal identification `ports/91940'. > The individual assigned to look at your > report is: freebsd-ports-bugs.=20 >=20 > You can access the state of your problem report at any time > via this link: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D91940 >=20 > Note: There was a bad value `no=3D20' for the field `>Confidential:'. > It was set to the default value of `yes'. >=20 >=20 > >Category: ports > >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs > >Synopsis: Unbreak port: editors/ooodict-all update checksums > >Arrival-Date: Wed Jan 18 08:00:23 GMT 2006 Hmmz bad value `no=3D20' for the field `>Confidential:' I wonder which mailer appended this... --=20 Vasil Dimov --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDzftrFw6SP/bBpCARAk+cAJ9ytQJ4gONRDi+rCicZDf2PAmxywwCeLs1j kI7ZtA8I+PMra0jSKzatT1U= =wuHM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601180830.k0I8UAJV079412>